You can't make this stuff up.
Children in Providence and East Providence can trade toy guns for real candy or toys on Friday and Saturday.
In Providence, children can feed their toy guns to the "Bash-O-Matic," a device designed and built by students at the New England Institute of Technology and the Rhode Island School of Design, Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch said.
The annual "Holiday Toy Gun Bash" will give an alternate toy to each child who relinquishes a gun from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Saturday at Pleasant View Elementary School, 50 Obadiah Brown Road, Providence.
Lynch will speak at noon, and he and other community leaders will discuss other ways to reduce gun violence and juvenile violence. Lynch will also take on challengers in a 3-point basketball shooting contest. There will be refreshments, games, a visit from Santa Claus, music and raffles by Hot 106, as well as a K-9 demonstration and a child ID program.
The New England Institute of Technology and the Rhode Island School of Design are creating Hoplophobes on campus now!. Just wait a few years when they become involved in politics.
Get em while they are young.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Do what I say or American business gets it. Says Obama to Congress
The Obama administration gives ultimatum to Congress.
Do what I say or business gets it.
The Obama administration is warning Congress that if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a "command-and-control" role over the process in a way that could hurt business. The gun to the head will be wielded by the EPA so that da BOSS has plausible deniability. People in Chicago should understand what is happening here.
Is this an example of the Executive Branch gone wild?
It was Obama's people that wrote the Bill in the first place.
It will be Obama's people that will be in charge of enforcing the bill once
passed by Congress.
It will be You and me paying the taxes that will go to the UN for distribution
to other countries.
Read
More here
Senate Set to Vote on Another Hoplophobic Judge
Here we go again.
First, there was Sonia Sotomayor. Then there was David Hamilton.
Now, we have another radical, anti-gun judge that has been nominated for the federal judiciary. His name is Louis Butler, and he is so radical, he was twice rejected by the people of Wisconsin (which is, by the way, one of the most liberal states in our union).
When Louis Butler first ran for the Wisconsin Supreme Court -- the voters rejected him by a 2-1 margin. When he was appointed to that court by Democrat Governor Jim Doyle and then stood for retention by the voters, they again rejected him. This was the first time a member of the Wisconsin Supreme Court was rejected by the voters in more than 40 years.
More importantly, Louis Butler opposes the rights of gun owners. The right to bear arms in the Wisconsin Constitution expressly notes that this right is for personal security and "any other lawful purpose." But in State v. Fischer, Judge Butler was the deciding vote in 2006 to hold that a Wisconsin statute barring carrying a concealed weapon for any purpose, at any time, including in a vehicle, does not violate this right to personal security that the voters of Wisconsin chose to expressly protect in their state constitution.
So he ignored the state constitution in order to impose his anti-gun views on the people of Wisconsin.
After the landmark U.S. Supreme Court Heller case upholding Second Amendment gun rights in 2008, Louis Butler spoke at an Obama for President fundraiser and specifically mentioned "gun control" as an issue that potential Obama appointees would impact.
"Gun control," Butler said, "may ultimately be decided, and the new appointees can tip the very balance of the court. [The] background, personal beliefs and policy decisions of the justices selected will influence how they will vote on the difficult cases before them."
There you have it. He is a radical activist who wants to move the courts -- and our country -- in a new direction. We've already had enough "hope and change" for a lifetime. We don't need another federal judge who will use his radical "personal beliefs" to reshape our society.
ACTION: Please contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to OPPOSE the nomination of Judge Louis Butler as U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin. Butler was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, and could now be voted on by the full Senate at any time.
You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your senators the pre-written e-mail message here.
First, there was Sonia Sotomayor. Then there was David Hamilton.
Now, we have another radical, anti-gun judge that has been nominated for the federal judiciary. His name is Louis Butler, and he is so radical, he was twice rejected by the people of Wisconsin (which is, by the way, one of the most liberal states in our union).
When Louis Butler first ran for the Wisconsin Supreme Court -- the voters rejected him by a 2-1 margin. When he was appointed to that court by Democrat Governor Jim Doyle and then stood for retention by the voters, they again rejected him. This was the first time a member of the Wisconsin Supreme Court was rejected by the voters in more than 40 years.
More importantly, Louis Butler opposes the rights of gun owners. The right to bear arms in the Wisconsin Constitution expressly notes that this right is for personal security and "any other lawful purpose." But in State v. Fischer, Judge Butler was the deciding vote in 2006 to hold that a Wisconsin statute barring carrying a concealed weapon for any purpose, at any time, including in a vehicle, does not violate this right to personal security that the voters of Wisconsin chose to expressly protect in their state constitution.
So he ignored the state constitution in order to impose his anti-gun views on the people of Wisconsin.
After the landmark U.S. Supreme Court Heller case upholding Second Amendment gun rights in 2008, Louis Butler spoke at an Obama for President fundraiser and specifically mentioned "gun control" as an issue that potential Obama appointees would impact.
"Gun control," Butler said, "may ultimately be decided, and the new appointees can tip the very balance of the court. [The] background, personal beliefs and policy decisions of the justices selected will influence how they will vote on the difficult cases before them."
There you have it. He is a radical activist who wants to move the courts -- and our country -- in a new direction. We've already had enough "hope and change" for a lifetime. We don't need another federal judge who will use his radical "personal beliefs" to reshape our society.
ACTION: Please contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to OPPOSE the nomination of Judge Louis Butler as U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin. Butler was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, and could now be voted on by the full Senate at any time.
You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your senators the pre-written e-mail message here.
How to spot a Haplophobe.
How to spot a Haplophobe.
A.) People who believe in moral relativism. Right and wrong are different for different people? Now they'll just say that "truth" is different for different people. As for their Agenda: Why let the truth stand in your way of our nobel cause?
B.) People that spout removing firearms from a civilized society will decrease voilence. As they live in gated communities and have a contingent of security with them at all times. (What does the security detail of Mayor Bloomberg carry?)
C.) People that are out of touch with the majority of US Citizens and consider them as commoners?
D.) People that shudder in fear when they read the words. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. And then try to revise the meaning.
E.) All of the Above.
A.) People who believe in moral relativism. Right and wrong are different for different people? Now they'll just say that "truth" is different for different people. As for their Agenda: Why let the truth stand in your way of our nobel cause?
B.) People that spout removing firearms from a civilized society will decrease voilence. As they live in gated communities and have a contingent of security with them at all times. (What does the security detail of Mayor Bloomberg carry?)
C.) People that are out of touch with the majority of US Citizens and consider them as commoners?
D.) People that shudder in fear when they read the words. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. And then try to revise the meaning.
E.) All of the Above.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Climate Gate and Gun Control (DjVu all over again) or Something is Rotten in Denmark
Many hoplophobic groups have had succeeded in their agenda, by creating a fear and misunderstanding about ASSAULT WEAPONs and particularly the AR-15. They have successfully turned the nomenclature to become the commonly accepted term for AR-15's, Black Rifles, and rifles that look scary. The AGENDA does not play fairly and does not waiver.
The Climate Change fanatics are trying to do the same thing. Taking something as erratic as the weather, making predictions 10 to 100 years out and turning the fear into the largest tax grab and distribution of wealth in history.
Everything was progressing well. Universities, the UN, celebrities, politicians and world leaders were taking the bait.
Even the weather channel began toting the politically correct mantra. I don't know about you, but the weather channel has a hard enough time correctly predicting the weather in 72 hours, much less 10 to 100 years out.
Over 200 world leaders began meeting in Copenhagen with about 150 of them holding their hands out expecting over 100 Billion in compensatory damages from the proceeds of Carbon Taxes.
No wonder over 200 countries can agree to meet in peace on one topic for the first time in the history of the universe.
Then Climate Gate!
Someone exposed e-mails from the main players that questioned the validity of the data. In fact these leaked e-mails show downright manipulation to the point of fraud.
Is this the end of the line for the carbon tax handout? Is the over 100 Billion dollar gift horse off to the glue factory?
Don't count on it.
Something very similar has happened in 2001. A book was published by a Professor that re-wrote the history of the role that firearms played in Colonial America.
His findings were hailed by the anti-Second Amendment Sophisticates of the time as proof that the Second Amendment did not mean what it said.
Meanwhile, someone decided to checkout the footnotes listed by the Professor and found that the conclusions and citations were not only wrong but down right deceptive.
These findings were then dismissed by the hoplophobics of the day because he was not an Academic. Who needs facts when the cause of the agenda is so righteous. The Main Stream Media of the day showed little interest in the matter. Sound familiar yet?
Luckily, a few virtuous Academics found that the conclusions and citations were not only wrong but down right deceptive.
A Peer Review was initiated and lo and behold the Professor turned author claimed that his notes were lost in a flood when the sprinkler system went off in his office.
Kind of like the IPCC scientist that said his data was deleted.
The Professor turned author was allowed to resign and the anti-Second Amendment Sophisticates continued to dismiss the errors as a Right Wing smear lead by the NRA.
Kind of like the Climate Gate Leak was designed by Russia or Big Oil.
What do insignificant things like facts and truth matter when the cause is so noble and just. I am beginning to wonder myself.
Read about the scandal involving the book :"Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture" by Professor Michael A. Bellesiles and the discoveries of Clayton Cramer
or a comparison of both scandals
Read what the UN really wants from the United Nations Climate Change Conference
A chronological history of the leaked climategate e-mails.
Just in: When the facts are contrary to a moral and just noble agenda, destroy and vilify the messenger. Here is what Don't call me Mam General, I'm a Senator Barbra Boxer has to say.
"You call it 'ClimateGate'; I call it 'E-mail-theft-gate,'" Boxer clarified during a committee shindig. "We may well have a hearing on this; we may not. We may have a briefing for senators; we may not." Boxer, as steady as they come, went on to put the focus where it belongs: on hackers. She warned: "Part of our looking at this will be looking at a criminal activity which could have well been coordinated. ... This is a
crime.
Gee, didn't see that one comin.....
Wake up America! You are being bamboozled!
Blog for Website http://www.modern-sporting-rifle.com/
The Climate Change fanatics are trying to do the same thing. Taking something as erratic as the weather, making predictions 10 to 100 years out and turning the fear into the largest tax grab and distribution of wealth in history.
Everything was progressing well. Universities, the UN, celebrities, politicians and world leaders were taking the bait.
Even the weather channel began toting the politically correct mantra. I don't know about you, but the weather channel has a hard enough time correctly predicting the weather in 72 hours, much less 10 to 100 years out.
Over 200 world leaders began meeting in Copenhagen with about 150 of them holding their hands out expecting over 100 Billion in compensatory damages from the proceeds of Carbon Taxes.
No wonder over 200 countries can agree to meet in peace on one topic for the first time in the history of the universe.
Then Climate Gate!
Someone exposed e-mails from the main players that questioned the validity of the data. In fact these leaked e-mails show downright manipulation to the point of fraud.
Is this the end of the line for the carbon tax handout? Is the over 100 Billion dollar gift horse off to the glue factory?
Don't count on it.
Something very similar has happened in 2001. A book was published by a Professor that re-wrote the history of the role that firearms played in Colonial America.
His findings were hailed by the anti-Second Amendment Sophisticates of the time as proof that the Second Amendment did not mean what it said.
Meanwhile, someone decided to checkout the footnotes listed by the Professor and found that the conclusions and citations were not only wrong but down right deceptive.
These findings were then dismissed by the hoplophobics of the day because he was not an Academic. Who needs facts when the cause of the agenda is so righteous. The Main Stream Media of the day showed little interest in the matter. Sound familiar yet?
Luckily, a few virtuous Academics found that the conclusions and citations were not only wrong but down right deceptive.
A Peer Review was initiated and lo and behold the Professor turned author claimed that his notes were lost in a flood when the sprinkler system went off in his office.
Kind of like the IPCC scientist that said his data was deleted.
The Professor turned author was allowed to resign and the anti-Second Amendment Sophisticates continued to dismiss the errors as a Right Wing smear lead by the NRA.
Kind of like the Climate Gate Leak was designed by Russia or Big Oil.
What do insignificant things like facts and truth matter when the cause is so noble and just. I am beginning to wonder myself.
Read about the scandal involving the book :"Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture" by Professor Michael A. Bellesiles and the discoveries of Clayton Cramer
or a comparison of both scandals
Read what the UN really wants from the United Nations Climate Change Conference
A chronological history of the leaked climategate e-mails.
Just in: When the facts are contrary to a moral and just noble agenda, destroy and vilify the messenger. Here is what Don't call me Mam General, I'm a Senator Barbra Boxer has to say.
"You call it 'ClimateGate'; I call it 'E-mail-theft-gate,'" Boxer clarified during a committee shindig. "We may well have a hearing on this; we may not. We may have a briefing for senators; we may not." Boxer, as steady as they come, went on to put the focus where it belongs: on hackers. She warned: "Part of our looking at this will be looking at a criminal activity which could have well been coordinated. ... This is a
crime.
Gee, didn't see that one comin.....
Wake up America! You are being bamboozled!
Blog for Website http://www.modern-sporting-rifle.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)